Taking the swine flu vaccine is MORE DANGEROUS THAN THE SWINE FLU!!!
by Michaelbrent Collings on Nov.10, 2009,under Fun, In real life
It's true.
I got a shot the other day. To avoid the swine flu. They made us fill out some forms that said there might be a "small chance" of side effects. "But hey," I said, "it's the government, right? And they protect us, right?"
This prompted several odd looks in my direction, since I was apparently talking to myself. I'm constantly surprised how often I get that look.
Anywho, I went up and took my shot. So did my wife. My kids took the nasal version, because they're a bunch of babies (plus when I started crying and then fainted after my shot, it might have affected them on some subconscious level).
And then the problems started. First it was itching. On my feet. I did that thing where you are too lazy to take off your shoe so you just try to rub your sole against something hard, then maybe stomp a few times, but it didn't work.
It also prompted more of those weird looks people were giving me. I also noticed several of them edging their fingers towards their cell phones like gunfighters in a saloon that they suspect someone just cheated at cards in.
But this isn't about my dreams of being a cowboy. It's about my feet. Focus, people!
Finally, I gave in and took off my shoes to scratch my feet. But to my amazement, the instant that I did so, the itching stopped. I put my shoes back on. The itching started again. I took them off. No itch.
I went immediately to the most obvious reason for this phenomenon: Voodoo curse. But then I realized something even more obvious: I was wearing leather shoes.
That's right, leather. As in, the skin of a pig. (Yes, I like patent pig-leather shoes. So sue me.)
And so I went and tested a theory: I went to a pickup football game and played a few innings (it's innings in football, right?). I didn't do too well, but I did get to "toss the ol' pigskin around." And guess what? Every time I touched the "pigskin," my hand got all itchy and I dropped the ball!
My teammates didn't believe that explanation, but I didn't care that they tossed me out of the game and told me never to come back or (direct quote) "We'll make sure you don't drop the ball by hot-glue-gunning it to your face."
Where these guys get hot glue guns, I don't know. But it didn't matter. I had found out what I needed from this pig-oriented sport.
Now, the ultimate test. I went to my fridge. I pried open some Farmer John bacon and... well... you know when you try to touch the wrong ends of a magnet together? How they push off each other no matter how hard you try to shove them together? That's what my fingers did with the bacon! No lie!
So I did some research. And guess what? There's no such thing as swine flu. It's all a hoax made up by the government. And after a little more research I discovered that "the government" is actually run by a shadow triumvirate of seven people who are all members of PETA.
And now it was really coming together. Avian virus? Swine flu? Aids from monkeys?
It's all a hoax to get us to take medications which will save animals! They're the ones benefiting from these crazy shots, not us! NOT US! And BTW, "To Serve Man"... is a cookbook. And soylent green is people.
All of which leads me to my real point. No, it's not that I'm crazy.
Actually, it's that some other people are.
Since the swine flu fears have arisen, I've heard a disturbing number of people talk about how dangerous it is to get the vaccine: more dangerous than not taking it would be. And most of the people I've heard saying that have had a kid in the shopping cart or a toddler on his/her hip. Which made me want to run screaming at them, grab the kids, and call Social Services.
Look, folks, the United States is one of the most medicinally anal-retentive countries in the world. I remember when I lived in Paraguay you could go into the equivalent of a Sav-On (albeit a Sav-On with only about 20 choices and flying cockroaches the size of a deck of cards), and just ask for Percocet or Vicodin like they were Pez... and you'd get 'em, no questions asked.
Other nations often have medicines available to them years before we do. Why? Perhaps it's because the biomed companies don't like the French, and so don't mind killing them off as part of a mass test of a product before releasing it in the US. But no, because the Swiss get those meds too, and really, who doesn't like the Swiss?
So the answer has to be that the US does not even allow vaccinations unless their benefit completely outweighs the disadvantages. And not by just a little: by a lot. People point to the polio vaccine as a counter-argument, because that vaccine did have a much higher than usual frequency of side-effects.
But it also a) was much safer than not being vaccinated, and b) wiped polio off the face of the earth.
Job well done, anyone?
So please, do your research. If you're worried about side effects of a vaccine, fine. You should be. But don't run around bragging about how you're saving your life and the lives of your children based on rumors from someone you overheard at the supermarket, or that idiot who blogs periodically and can't seem to stay focused on anything because - ooh, look, a bunny!
What was I saying?
Oh, yes. Get vaccinated. It's highly preferable to the alternative. Plus, if, for example, I was a large-ish guy and I found out that your kid got swine flu because you wouldn't let him/her get the shot, and your kid infected others, and one of those others was my best friend (who is an idiot and didn't get his swine flue shot)... I'd probably have to think about coming after you.
Just like a gunfighter in the old west.
It always comes down to the saloon, don't it, pardner...





6 comments
So as for what was satire and what wasn't... it was all satire. And it was all my point of view, as well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXJDMSAaSU0
I want you to argue with this girl:... Read More
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mh5F5wP8RdU
For starters, the vaccine hasn't been shown to stop the so-called swine flu!!! What's the rush?? Each time my wife or kids received a flu shot, they got the worst flu of their lives. i don't believe in injecting my body full of toxins, especially neurotoxins and staggering levels of mercury. I know there have been plenty of studies that disprove the autism link, but I'm not arguing about autism. And I really don't see the point of having a debate about which side is more ignorant on this issue. This is obviously an issue that is very personal to the individual, so I'm not sure why you would want to get into it. I would've just kept this to myself but you basically called me ignorant or irresponsible.
In the end, I would respect your opinion if it were delivered with a little more humility and balance. I don't care if you get the shot or not and you should afford me the same respect.[reprinted from FB threat with Abernathy]
That being said: best argument against the doc: the newscaster saying he'd interviewed three other docs in three days and ALL of them said they'd give it to their kids. As for the problems with the possible interactions between the vacccine and certain genetic or blood disorders (we've already disproved the autism thing), the question isn't whether there is a link, the question is whether you have a better CHANCE with or without the swine flu. REGULAR flu kills about 36,000 people/year (http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us_flu-related_deaths.htm). Worldwide, the number is obviously MUCH higher. Whereas the number of deaths or injury related to interaction between ANY mass market vaccination in the US as compared to the number of deaths or injury related to the disease itself shows a staggering disparity. I'd rather bet that my kids don't have mitochondrial dysfunction (only 50,000 people have it in the US TOTAL - http://www.mindbodyfocused.com/articles/body/fatigue/mitochondrial-disease.php - which means in only two years you have way many more flu fatalities) than that they won't get the flu, particularly not a virulent strain like swine flu.
Best argument against the girl: "Rare, 1 in a million" neurological disfunction. Again. That means that if EVERYONE in the US got the shot, we'd have around 400 people with this problem (if it is, in fact, linked causally to the seasonal flu shot, which the newscast implied but never came out and said... editorial indication that they could not find verification for the implication or you can bet they'd have had a doctor on that intervieww). 400 people with a neurological disorder versus the confirmed THOUSANDS that are saved each year by the flu shot. Additionally, dystopia can be caused by many different factors (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dystonia), and again, though there was a correlation between her flu shot and the manifestation of her symptoms, there were no sources on that news piece that causally linked them to the shot itself... but saying "She got it because she inherited it as a genetic disorder" may not have been as interesting a take on the story. Leading me to my second response to this piece: its source. Inside Edition. Infotainment, not a great source for legitimate news information.
Finally, on a more personal note: Mark, we're buds and I'm sorry if I pissed you off. I write my blogs with an intent to make people a) laugh, b) think, or c) do a little of both. Unfortunately what may be funny or thought-provoking to me may come off as crass, tasteless, or even "lacking in humility or balance" to you. Sorry to tread your toes, my friend. I do actually believe what I said in the piece - the point of it, anyway - which is that given the actual statistics of cost/benefit ratios to taking the shot versus not taking the shot, it's irresponsible not to if you have the chance. But another person may see it differently. I have my statistics and studies to support my position; others may have their own. And in a week or a month or a year I might come across some study that makes me whack my forehead, cut my kids' arms open, and do my best to suck out the vaccine (my wife will attest that I've been wrong before... the good news is I try to admit it when it happens).
But again, no name-calling intended. Just a laugh and/or some thinking.
Some thinking has occurred here - at least, I've had to look at some more counter-views and see how they stack up against my own, so I'VE been forced to think (and you know I hate that, Mark) - so I guess this column succeeded for me. Whether it did for anyone else I cannot say. But I CAN say I've appreciated your pointing out other viewpoints. If nothing else, it proves that you're still Mark: I've never known you to back down on calling someone an ass when you thought they were being an ass.
So, proud to be your ass of a friend,
Mb
;o)
This post has 4 feedbacks awaiting moderation...
Leave a comment